From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Thu Mar 6 14:09 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA05037 Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:09:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id OAA09474; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:13:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma009466; Thu, 6 Mar 03 14:13:12 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: guardian.hartwellcorp.com: mail set sender to using -f Message-ID: From: "Michael St. Laurent" To: "fwtk-users" Subject: [fwtk-users] More info on the Folder View problem Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:33:53 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 596 It seems that the problem is that once "Enable folder view for FTP sites" is enabled, IE insists on using passive mode with a PASV command instead of a PORT command. What's the best option for getting PASV to work in http-gw? According to the patches page the 'gopu' patch is for version 2.0 instead of 2.1. Also, as far as I can see it's not a patch but rather replacement source files. -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Thu Mar 6 18:27 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA05458 Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:27:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id SAA15024; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 18:32:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma015018; Thu, 6 Mar 03 18:31:43 -0500 Message-Id: X-Sender: rmurphy@mail.itm-inst.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:47:15 -0500 To: "fwtk-users" From: Rick Murphy Subject: [fwtk-users] Re: More info on the Folder View problem In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Length: 1116 At 10:33 AM 3/6/2003 -0800, Michael St. Laurent wrote: >It seems that the problem is that once "Enable folder view for FTP >sites" is >enabled, IE insists on using passive mode with a PASV command instead of a >PORT command. > >What's the best option for getting PASV to work in http-gw? You're using ftp-gw, not http-gw. Or, what you're saying makes no sense. When you use the http-gw as a ftp proxy, the web browser sends a "GET ftp:// HTTP/1.0" format request to the http-gw; it then does all the FTP accesses from within the web proxy and returns the ftp information in html format. I don't know what happens between the browser and the proxy when you enable folder view, but there's no way, given the protocol that's involved, for the browser to ask the proxy to format the FTP site differently. (Specifically, the PASV command is illegal at this point, since the protocol between the browser and the proxy is HTTP, not FTP.) -Rick --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Mon Mar 10 20:25 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA16948 Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:25:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id UAA19379; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 20:30:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma019345; Mon, 10 Mar 03 20:29:30 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: guardian.hartwellcorp.com: mail set sender to using -f Message-ID: From: "Michael St. Laurent" To: "fwtk-users" Subject: [fwtk-users] More info on the Folder View problem Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 17:28:47 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 769 Forgive me if this has already been sent to the list but I haven't seen it appear on the list. For that matter, I've not seen ANYTHING from the list for about a week now. It seems that the problem is that once "Enable folder view for FTP sites" is enabled, IE insists on using passive mode with a PASV command instead of a PORT command. What's the best option for getting PASV to work in http-gw? According to the patches page the 'gopu' patch is for version 2.0 instead of 2.1. Also, as far as I can see it's not a patch but rather replacement source files. -- Michael St. Laurent Hartwell Corporation --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Tue Mar 11 04:58 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA18044 Tue, 11 Mar 2003 04:58:00 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id FAA06690; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 05:02:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma006667; Tue, 11 Mar 03 05:02:29 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: spider.usrconsult.be: mail set sender to using -f Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:00:53 +0100 From: Michel Bardiaux User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "fwtk-users" Subject: [fwtk-users] Protecting smap against -d attacks? Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Length: 582 Setup: firewall running smap; sendmail is the internal MTA. Problem: we are repeatedly attacked with floods of mails with "Subject: -d". Although that very old-fashioned attack fails, it causes a DoS because it fills a disk on the central server. Is there already a patch to smap to drop mails based on Subject? -- Michel Bardiaux Peaktime Belgium S.A. Bd. du Souverain, 191 B-1160 Bruxelles Tel : +32 2 790.29.41 --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Tue Mar 11 11:01 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA19192 Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:01:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id LAA14988; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 11:06:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma014977; Tue, 11 Mar 03 11:06:01 -0500 Subject: [fwtk-users] Re: More info on the Folder View problem From: Blair Lowe To: "fwtk-users" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.90 (Preview Release) Date: 11 Mar 2003 09:06:26 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 1197 Hi, Why are you setting up your ftp with http-gw, and not ftp-gw? If you are only allowing downloads, why not use http exclusively in the html downloads, and not ftp url's. Blair. On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 18:28, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > Forgive me if this has already been sent to the list but I haven't seen it > appear on the list. For that matter, I've not seen ANYTHING from the list > for about a week now. > > It seems that the problem is that once "Enable folder view for FTP sites" is > enabled, IE insists on using passive mode with a PASV command instead of a > PORT command. > > What's the best option for getting PASV to work in http-gw? > > According to the patches page the 'gopu' patch is for version 2.0 instead of > 2.1. Also, as far as I can see it's not a patch but rather replacement > source files. -- GET WEBMAIL FOR YOUR DOMAIN: https://www.zedemail.ca Computer Engineering Inc. Tel 780 450 8494 or TOLL FREE 1 877 968 7626 (9-5 Mountain Time) Fax 780 435 0693 --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Fri Mar 14 22:30 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA03878 Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:30:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id WAA23278; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:35:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma023203; Fri, 14 Mar 03 22:35:08 -0500 Message-Id: X-Sender: rmurphy@mail.itm-inst.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 22:33:16 -0500 To: "fwtk-users" From: Rick Murphy Subject: [fwtk-users] Forwarding message for Keith Young Cc: "Young, Keith" Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Content-Length: 2463 I'm not sure that this made it to the list or not. Just to make sure, I'm forwarding this versus redirecting it. On a personal note, I am disappointed in Secure Computing's decision to interpret the FWTK license as prohibiting commercial usage. -Rick >From: "Young, Keith" >To: > > >Rick, > >Would you mind sending this to the FWTK mailing list? The list server >seems to keep eating my e-mails, even after subscribing/unsubscribing... > >Sorry to ask you, but you are the only person I recognize who is still >active on the list... > >Thanks much, > >--Keith > >========================================================= >Yep, after 7 years of being involved with the FWTK, I am stepping down >as maintainer of WWW.FWTK.ORG. This is due to a couple of reasons: > 1) Unlike TIS/NAI, SecureComputing has announced that they will >be enforcing all aspects of the FWTK license, including the >commercial-use clause: > >http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/FWTK_Licensing_FAQ.pdf >While TIS/NAI did not allow you to profit from the FWTK, they did not >enforce the use of it within a for-profit organization. > 2) I've spent a fair number of years trying to convince >TIS/NAI/SC to changing the FWTK licensing to a more open/GPL based >license. Unfortunately, as proven by the above link, I have not been >successful. > 3) Several packages now exist that "compete" with the FWTK and >are being actively updated. > 4) I never thought that raising a 2 year-old daughter would take >so much time ;-) > >So, if anyone would like to continue my efforts please let me know. > >Thanks to: > Rick Murphy, I think that SecureComputing *really* needs you >right now ;-) > Bill Casti who donated the server, bandwidth, and domain fees >since the first day > Ark, is "FWTK NG" released yet? > Joe Yao who told me two years ago that raising a daughter will >take lots of time > Marcus Ranum who has long forgotten about the FWTK and has gone >onto bigger things > *lots* of other people who I can't remember right now > >Special thanks to everyone who supplied patches, docs, and FAQ answers. > >Cheers, > >--Keith Young >-Security Manager, Montgomery County Maryland USA --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Fri Mar 14 23:28 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA03963 Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:28:10 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id XAA25465; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:33:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma025435; Fri, 14 Mar 03 23:32:51 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: rainmaker.dreamwvr.com: neo set sender to dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com using -f Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:31:49 -0700 From: "dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com" To: "fwtk-users" Subject: [fwtk-users] Re: Forwarding message for Keith Young Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 1241 On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:33:16PM -0500, Rick Murphy wrote: > I'm not sure that this made it to the list or not. Just to make sure, > I'm forwarding this versus redirecting it. > > On a personal note, I am disappointed in Secure Computing's decision to > interpret the FWTK license as prohibiting commercial usage. > -Rick Helo; Keith and Rick; very long time no stream to. Anyhow I think this is personally a sad commentary from TIS. (Was it really ~7 years ago?) Well I know where your coming from spawning children does make life interesting;-) So we are now at a impassable abyss? Does this mean that the list/the site etc are finito? This would be a 'dark_friday' if that is the case. Very_Best Regards, dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com -- /* Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr */ # # Note: To begin Journey type man afterboot,man help,man hier[.] # // "Who's Afraid of Schrodinger's Cat?" /var/(.)?mail/me \? ;-] --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Fri Mar 14 23:40 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA04002 Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:40:24 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id XAA25954; Fri, 14 Mar 2003 23:45:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma025940; Fri, 14 Mar 03 23:45:06 -0500 Subject: [fwtk-users] Re: Forwarding message for Keith Young From: Blair Lowe To: "fwtk-users" In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.90 (Preview Release) Date: 14 Mar 2003 21:46:51 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 1325 Ditto, We used smap lots, but now we use qmail, so we no longer need it. It was really a great piece of "open source", though. Maybe someone wants to start a new project at source forge using GPL, or something to create a new firewall from scratch. There is certainly enough knowledge base in this group. TTYL, Blair. On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 21:31, dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com wrote: > On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 10:33:16PM -0500, Rick Murphy wrote: > > I'm not sure that this made it to the list or not. Just to make sure, > > I'm forwarding this versus redirecting it. > > > > On a personal note, I am disappointed in Secure Computing's decision to > > interpret the FWTK license as prohibiting commercial usage. > > -Rick > Helo; > Keith and Rick; > very long time no stream to. Anyhow I think this is > personally a sad commentary from TIS. (Was it really ~7 years ago?) > Well I know where your coming from spawning children does > make life interesting;-) So we are now at a impassable abyss? > Does this mean that the list/the site etc are finito? > This would be a 'dark_friday' if that is the case. > > Very_Best Regards, dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com From bounce-fwtk-users-303@listserv.nai.com Sun Mar 16 13:20 EST 2003 Received: from sentry.gw.tislabs.com (firewall-user@sentry.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA07228 Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:20:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by sentry.gw.tislabs.com; id NAA17462; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:25:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from listserv.nai.com(205.227.136.196) by sentry.gw.tislabs.com via smap (V5.5) id xma017454; Sun, 16 Mar 03 13:25:27 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: rainmaker.dreamwvr.com: neo set sender to dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com using -f Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 11:24:08 -0700 From: "dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com" To: "fwtk-users" Subject: [fwtk-users] Re: Forwarding message for Keith Young Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i List-Unsubscribe: Reply-To: "fwtk-users" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 847 hello, Does this mean as well that the website and all historical data contained as well as list traffic will be no more? This 'should_be' kept for historical and relational reference. I for one would like to see that. This also has been a great adventure. Well appreciate any insights on this particular subject. Best Regards, dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com -- /* Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr */ # # Note: To begin Journey type man afterboot,man help,man hier[.] # // "Who's Afraid of Schrodinger's Cat?" /var/(.)?mail/me \? ;-] --- You are currently subscribed to fwtk-users as: fwtk-archive@lists.tislabs.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-fwtk-users-303A@listserv.nai.com